This Post Has 4 Comments

1. 

   sophiaserpentia November 24, 2004 Reply

   I responded to your argument that the Gospel of Thomas is a 4th century forgery.

   That said, I’ve not read The Da Vinci Code but I’ve gotten the impression from conversation with others that it does have a lot of nonsense. The whole ‘Priory of Sion’/’Holy Blood Holy Grail’ thing was demonstrated to be a hoax, the documents forgeries, yet it persists for some reason.

   Loading...
   1. 

      David Ould November 24, 2004 Reply

      update on the 4th Century thing,

      http://www.ntcanon.org/Gospel_of_Thomas.shtml asserts that it’s c. 150AD. My bad.

      Not that it changes any of the arguments re the purpose of Nicea

      Loading...
2. 

   prester_scott November 24, 2004 Reply

   Itching ears.

   Loading...
3. 

   wrytrz_instnkz November 24, 2004 Reply

   I love reading your posts…I always learn something.

   Loading...