Bishop Curnow of Bendigo supports changing Christian view of Marriage and Euthanasia

You are currently viewing Bishop Curnow of Bendigo supports changing Christian view of Marriage and Euthanasia

The retiring bishop of Bendigo, Andrew Curnow, has used one of his very last columns in the diocesan newspaper “Spirit” to come out in support of both marriage redefinition and upcoming legislation in Victoria for euthanasia. Sources tell that his remarks in the September 2017 issue have left many in the diocese “not happy and very disappointed”.

The bishop’s comments come on page 2 of the issue (copy embedded below) and while he closes by urging his readers to “vote with your conscience” it is very clear which side Curnow’s conscience has led him to on both questions:

Many church leaders have come out strongly on both issues mainly advocating for no change to existing legislation. Marriage is between a man and a woman is the traditional Christian point of view, but that does not mean it cannot change. For over seventeen centuries many Christians believed in slavery, but that did not stop William Wilberforce from coming along and pointing out that it was no longer consistent with Christian teaching or practice. It still took a civil war in a Christian country to bring it to an end.

On the issue of assisted dying I do not agree with many Christians that what is being advocated is suicide by another name. I am also glad that the  Victorian parliament has agreed to a conscience vote by members on the issue. This seems to me to be acting with integrity and understanding and an attempt by parliament to act responsibly. I have looked at the legislation and do not agree that it undervalues or reduces the sanctity of life. Modern medicine has brought great benefits to many of us but as it says in the Book of Ecclesiastes, “There is a time to be born, and a time to die”.

Ultimately on the issue of marriage equality and assisted dying I would encourage you to vote with your conscience. Try not to be judgemental and bear in mind that our nation is one of the last nations on earth trying to embrace the value and standard of a harmonious safe society.

Bishop Curnow’s comments stand in some contrast to the following motions passed at the recent General Synod of the Anglican Church of Australia held in September 2017:

16.21 Marriage, same-sex marriage and the blessing of same-sex relationships

The General Synod –

(i) recognises that the doctrine of our church, in line with traditional Christian teaching, is that marriage is an exclusive and lifelong union of a man and a woman, and further,

(ii) recognises that this has been the subject of several General Synod resolutions over the past fifteen years, and also

(iii) recognises that the nature of marriage is the subject of ongoing conversation within the church and wider community and that we need to listen to each other with care and respect, and

(iv) acknowledges the experiences and genuine concerns of LGBTIQ+ people within the church and the community, and therefore

(v) asks the Doctrine Commission to facilitate a respectful conversation in our church by means o f a collection of essays on marriage and same-sex relationships that explores Scriptural and theological issues relating to:
a. The doctrine of marriage expressed in the formularies of the Anglican Church of Australia

b. Our current Australian context, exploring the relationship between the State’s definition of marriage and the church’s doctrine of marriage

c. Key Old Testament and New Testament texts on sex, marriage and friendship

d. Scripture and hermeneutics

e. A theology of blessing

f. A theology of desire

g. Godly disagreement on this issue

h. The case for and against same-sex marriage and/or the blessing of same-sex unions.

21.4 Assisted Dying

The General Synod, noting the push for “assisted dying’’ in a number of Australian States –

a) Opposes the legalisation of assisted dying;

b) Urges all Australian State and Territory governments to better resource palliative care services, to improve palliative care in the community, including regional and remote communities, Aboriginal communities and nursing homes, and to provide better training in palliative care for all health professionals; and

c) Urges Australian Anglicans to contact their MP’s to express their views.

Leave a Reply

This Post Has 4 Comments

  1. Bruce Lyon

    Extremely disappointing and concerning Bishop.

    But a deeper more personal question arises.

    Are you yet saved unto Eternal Life? Or are you a false teacher destined for the pit, as Revelation points to?

  2. S Waller

    One of the last??? did I read 25 out of 194 somewhere?

  3. carmelo grasso

    Interesting to read Bishop Curnow’s exhortation to the Anglican Populace to “vote with your conscience” and “don’t be judgemental… well I suppose even Cardinal Newman in his letter to the Duke of Norfolk discusses the issue of conscience…but I daresay he did not mean it to be interpreted to vote as you feel. That is what Bishop Curnow seems to be saying. More importantly… the cry to not be judgmental is likely to cause people to fail to use “discernment” … the end of the day we will be judged…..yes perhaps via our conscience….but an informed conscience…Where is the good shepherd meant to lead the church and where is the Holy Spirit and his counsel….well per Bishop Curnow it appears there is no collective doctrine… to each his own!!!!!! We need leadership…not counsel for each to do as each feels at the time. The disjointed opinions from bishops in any quarter only fragments the Church and ultimately the people……it will be so diluted that like salt diluted to the extreme it will lack any substance

  4. Richard J Simpson

    Even if we are in Christ our consciences are not the Holy Spirit or the God breathed Word. Being one who suffers from an over-sensitive conscience myself I find that this advice is very unhelpful. Our consciences need renewing and our minds require a transforming revelation from God in order to apprehend his mind. The Scriptures are very clear on the issue of marriage and how God defines it in order to express himself and reveal the love of Christ through it. If we are to hold forth Christ or more accurately if Christ is to be known in our marriages they must be formed and understood in a way that God intends. To have anything other than this is to misrepresent Christ and obscure the gospel. It is very distressing that there should be a movement toward accommodation of a distorted view of Christ through marriage which is being suggested or tolerated or accommodated all in the name of loving people. If we love people then we must in love tell them the truth even thought this may bring ridicule and suffering. The Lord himself has gone before us and we must follow him despite the cost.

Leave a Comment - but please pay careful attention to the house rules