It’s a wonderful example of a sustained debate on the topic of homosexuality. But more than that it exposes the paucity of Bell’s argument. Watch carefully how he avoids clear answers, has no comprehensive unitive biblical theology, avoids specific exegesis of the text, appeals to the Lord’s Supper as a “cover-all” unitive act, and then finally gets angry and swears when he realises he actually doesn’t have an answer that will allow him to maintain his self-description as an orthodox Christian. That last point is key, friends, time and time again liberals get really really frustrated when they get exposed as “giving up an orthodox position” (as Brierly, the show’s presenter, puts it).
On a related note, Where Are Rob Bell’s Glasses?