davidould.net

non angelus, sed anglus!

Priest tells actively homosexual judge to repent

A fascinating story here in Sydney, reported by the smh.

A SENIOR minister of a Sydney Anglican parish has made an extraordinary attack on the High Court judge Michael Kirby, warning he would face the wrath of God if he remained unrepentant as a gay man.

The rector of St Stephen’s Church in Bellevue Hill, the Reverend Richard Lane, denounced the judge for calling himself a Christian Anglican while living in an openly gay relationship and warned as a “messenger, watchman and steward of the Lord in the Anglican Church of Australia”, he faced God’s judgment.

To call himself a Christian Anglican was a “perversion of truth” and to continue to do so without changing his lifestyle would brand him, like Herod, a “coward, a liar, a deceiver” and a “lawless one”.

“I appeal to you to cast yourself on the mercy of Jesus … That is admit your sin, confess your wrongdoing and turn in humble repentance to the Lord Jesus, who alone can forgive you,” Mr Lane said.

The attack came in an exchange of letters between the priest and the judge which was cited during a forum organised by St James Institute on Tuesday night to encourage a “public conversation” about religious tolerance and homosexuality. Justice Kirby shared the stage with the Herald’s David Marr.

The letters prompted a complaint from Justice Kirby to the Anglican Archbishop of Sydney, Peter Jensen, who also asserts that homosexual practices are sinful.

“The archbishop’s injunction to me, which was quite sensible I thought, was we’ll give this person the benefit of the doubt,” Justice Kirby told the audience. “He probably thinks he’s doing you a favour and you should just see whether there is any truth in what he says, and think about it.”

Mr Lane’s attack was provoked by Justice Kirby’s assertion on ABC Radio late last year that the Anglican and Catholic archbishops of Sydney, Peter Jensen and George Pell, had, via religious instruction, made it hard for people to adopt a more tolerant attitude to gays.

Urging the judge to open himself to “God’s healing of homosexuality”, Mr Lane said Justice Kirby was a hypocrite for choosing to remain inside the church but claiming that homosexual practice “or any other sin” was in accordance with God’s will.

Mr Lane proposed circulating the written exchange with fellow clergy to ask the question: “Am I wrong?” Justice Kirby has agreed to this.

In reply he argued Mr Lane’s interpretation of biblical injunctions against homosexuality was not a universal one, and the biblical quotations used were unreliable mid-19th century translations. Mr Lane appeared to have turned a blind eye to the “central loving message of Jesus of the gospels”.

“To defy modern knowledge and to stick to uninformed interpretations is truly irrational. To do so selectively is specially so. It is a reason why the churches are losing rational adherents.”

Mr Lane declined to comment yesterday. Dr Jensen said correspondence between Mr Lane and Justice Kirby needed to be read fully and in context. “I have a long-standing personal relationship with Justice Kirby and he and I have communicated about these letters in confidence,” he said.

I don’t know how you respond to this. First, it’s important to note that this was part of an ongoing dialogue between the Lane and Kirby that Kirby himself agreed should be circulated. Indeed, Kirby himself had promoted a public debate on this very subject and it would have been no surprise to him that Lane held the position that he did - albeit expressed in a stark way.

The ACL make an interesting observation:

This story raises the question – how should a minister understand his ordination vows? Here are the words of the Bishop to the Candidates in the 1662 Ordinal –

“Ye have heard, Brethren, as well in your private examination, as in the exhortation which was now made to you, and in the holy Lessons taken out of the Gospel, and the writings of the Apostles, of what dignity, and of how great importance this Office is, whereunto ye are called.
And now again we exhort you, in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye have in remembrance, into how high a Dignity, and to how weighty an Office and Charge ye are called: that is to say, to be Messengers, Watchmen, and Stewards of the Lord; to teach, and to premonish [i.e. warn], to feed and provide for the Lord’s family; to seek for Christ’s sheep that are dispersed abroad… that they may be saved through Christ for ever.

Have always therefore printed in your remembrance, how great a treasure is committed to your charge. For they are the sheep of Christ, which he bought with his death, and for whom he shed his blood. …”

(Full Ordinal is available here.)

Indeed. We may not feel comfortable with how Lane fulfilled his duty, but we have to admire his integrity and loyalty to his vows. Which is, after all, really loyalty to the Lord Jesus Christ.

Posted by on 04/12 at 08:57 PM

<< Back to main

Statistics

This page has been viewed 82842 times
Page rendered in 0.7146 seconds
Total Entries: 834
Total Comments: 3506
Total Trackbacks: 2386
Most Recent Entry: 09/05/2008 03:15 pm
Most Recent Comment on: 09/05/2008 07:43 pm
Total Members: 4
Total Logged in members: 0
Total guests: 13
Total anonymous users: 0
Most Recent Visitor on: 09/08/2008 07:37 pm
The most visitors ever was 96 on 07/01/2007 09:30 am