davidould.net
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Feedburner
  • Foursquare
  • Google
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • Rss
  • Home
  • content
    • blog
    • talks/sermons
      • Old Testament
        • Genesis
        • Leviticus
        • Numbers
        • Job
        • Zechariah
      • New Testament
        • Matthew
        • Mark
        • Luke
        • John
        • 2 Corinthians
        • Philippians
        • Colossians
        • Hebrews
      • Doctrine
  • other stuff
    • Glenquarie Anglican Church
    • Anglican Church League
    • Stand Firm
  • about David
    • non angelus?
  • contact
    • sign up to the Ould newsletter

The Modern Marriage Ideology

Posted on June 8, 2012 by David Ould in Sexual Ethics 1 Comment
Home» Blog » hot topics » Sexual Ethics » The Modern Marriage Ideology
The Modern Marriage Ideology

A magnificent piece by Andrew Cameron of Moore Theological College in the Southern Cross and on sydneyanglicans.net

In the middle of these changing loves, Christians can ask helpful questions (there’s not much point being polemical when so little thought has been given to the nature of marriage). We can ask our neighbours: ‘Are you sure that you are not missing something? Do you really want to abandon those older loves? Will that actually help us as a community?’.

For marriage has named that part of our social ecology constituted by lifelong, sexually exclusive, gender-complementary relationships. To date, these relationships have been thought unique enough to deserve special recognition. Although not all marriages result in children, marriage affirms the link between children and their biological parents. But a move to ‘marriage equality’ finally dissembles this link. A gay couple must always source its child’s biological parent from outside the relationship, so to call the couple married confirms that biological parenthood is not integral to our understanding of marriage, nor expected of marriage. That in turn suggests that we believe loving biological parenthood is not particularly important to children’s wellbeing.

The public link between men, women and biological offspring has worked for the public good, despite the fact that some married people don’t have children. Opponents of the change simply want to ask others: are you sure you want to change all that? And do the gains in public good proposed for gays and lesbians suffice to offset the public good we think is being diminished? The argument that marriage simply names people’s love for those who want it so named misses the wider social canvas at stake (and the argument that marriage is necessary for gay mental health is simply odd, for surely there are many other means to this end).

To ask the questions ‘Are you sure?’ and ‘Are you missing something?’ doesn’t ‘impose’ anything on anybody. The charge of ‘imposing’ simply distracts us from discussing marriage (and is a form of emotional blackmail that cripples a lot of discussion in Australia).* Even though the Bible shapes our view of marriage, it’s a view that can be useful in public discussion when it gains traction with others and makes sense to them. Our view of marriage makes deep sense to those in society who feel the tug of marriage as we now know it.

Read it all

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google +1
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • More
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit

One comment on “The Modern Marriage Ideology”

  1. Confession: I have been a bad citizen of blogworld | St. Eutychus says:
    June 10, 2012 at 12:05 am

    [...] David posted a good little review of the 2 Ways 2 Live App, and a better post about marriage and stuff. [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

My Tweets

podcast

  • James 2:14-26 – Faith without works is dead
  • James 2:1-13
  • James 1:12-27
  • Peter’s Confession of Christ – Sermon
  • Today’s Dividing Line

2 Corinthians atheism awkward family photos BC 1662 brain Briefing church of england Colossians diamond jubilee ecclesiastes equality eternity ethics evolution false premises forever geek gay marriage gospel history instant fundas James japan japanese fellowship singapore jesus Job John judgement lego Leviticus lord of the rings lotr luke minifigs new atheists Numbers photos pitch drop experiment prayers queen queen elizabeth ii rights singapore slideshow st george's singapore valentine's day

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.

join the discussion…

  • Sam Allberry – Is God Anti-Gay? [video] | davidould.net on Another UK Evangelical “Comes Out” … for Jesus
  • David Ould on Why Rick. – Another Candidate for Archbishop of Sydney
  • Ros Keech on Why Rick. – Another Candidate for Archbishop of Sydney
  • Obfuscation & Rob Bell | Creideamh a-mhàin on Andrew Wilson and Rob Bell on Unbelievable
  • Tom Lovett on Why Rick. – Another Candidate for Archbishop of Sydney
  • David Ould on Why Rick. – Another Candidate for Archbishop of Sydney
FCA

Recent Posts

  • James 2:14-26 – Faith without works is dead
  • Sam Allberry – Is God Anti-Gay? [video]
  • Bruce Hall endorses Rick Smith
  • The Four Courtrooms of James 2:1-13
  • Andrew Wilson and Rob Bell on Unbelievable
  • James 2:1-13
  • James 1:12-27
  • Why Rick Video 1

Top Posts & Pages

  • Why Rick. - Another Candidate for Archbishop of Sydney
  • Anarchy in the UK
  • Vaughan Roberts, "Same-Sex Attraction - A Battle I Face" - a model of a godly response
  • And They're Off... The Race Begins for Archbishop of Sydney
  • about David
  • Why Rick Video 1
  • Andrew Wilson and Rob Bell on Unbelievable
  • Bruce Hall endorses Rick Smith
  • I Can't Give Blood

Blogroll

  • Prydain
  • Our Life – Our Family
  • SinFest
  • pakman81
  • BLAK
  • These Infinite Spaces
  • St Georges
  • Biblical Theology Briefings – BeginningWithMoses.org
  • Phil’s Treehouse
  • xkcd.com

(c) 2012 davidould.net | site design: Swagger by Jason Bobich | logo design: Carla Rolfe.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.